Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
- 0 Posts
- 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: September 2nd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
The ultimate question of philosophy…
“"Should I kill myself, or have a cup of coffee?”
-Camus
Why did 2 break up with zero?
Some 1 got between them!
8·1 year agoAgreed but the puritans that have to give it up before we can expect sites like this to overexpose themselves to legal action.
proofs of idiocy and/or bad faith they offer
Then a downvote is justified, same user or not.
F in the chat for victims of the Great Oxygenation Event.
Can’t deradicalize extremists without engaging them. Not to say where and when that should happen, or that the moral argument is even relevant. As Popper said in the wake of WWII,
If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.
Okay… and what about Alexander, Ceasar, Ali, Genghis, Napoleon, and all the rest? The claim that empires are only motivated by profits is absurd.
You ask what is our aim? I can answer in one word: memes. Meme at all costs. Meme in spite of all terror. Meme however long and hard the banhammer may strike. For without memes there is no dank content.
They’ve done studies on this. Single blokes die sooner because they haven’t got a Mrs to nag them. “Nag”.
1·1 year agoSo the devs are insentivised to keep it in a perpetual alpha stage, wiping users game progress every couple months.
That’s… not relevant to my point at all.
Make it apple employees in store and Microsoft forums. If humans give bad advice 10% of the time and Ai (or any technological replacement) makes mistakes 1% of the time, you can’t point to that 1% as a gotcha.