• 1 Post
  • 40 Comments
Joined 3 days ago
cake
Cake day: January 28th, 2025

help-circle



  • Feels fake somehow don’t know why.

    Anyway, respect everybody’s boundaries and let people live. Maybe you have been a little bit too excited to all this thing and its you that is rushing your friends who don’t want to hurt your feelings.

    I have been to plenty of nudist places and we had our couple (never swing) sex there as well. But either BOTH are ok with it, or its just not nice at all to keep pushing, which is what you seems to be doing.

    Maybe I am wrong, after all I am only a random dude on the 'net who doesn’t know you except from what you write, and I haven’t even checked your profile or past posts.



  • Its nice and pretty nerdy. As web based nmarkdown editor in pretty good and the extra features rocks.

    It has a few quirks I don’t like though, on the self-hosted side:

    • no multi-user support.
    • auth is quirky and required a ticket to make it work at all
    • must be deployed on subdomain, which make it impossible to host multiple instances for multiple users easily

    But from functionality point of view, I love it












  • No, the router being the SPOF (single point of failure) is totally avoidable.

    At mny home (no SaaS services offered, but critical “enough” for my life services) i have two different ISPs on two different tecnologies: one is FTTC via copper cable (aka good old ADSL successor) plus a WFA 5G (much faster but with data cap). Those two are connected to one opnSense router (which, indeed, is a SPOF at this time). But you can remove also this SPOF by adding a second opnSense and tie the two in failover.

    So the setup would be:

    • FTTC -> ISP1 router -> LAN cable 1 to port 1 of opnSense n.1
    • FTTC -> ISP1 router -> LAN cable 2 to port 1 of opnSense n.2
    • FWA -> ISP2 router -> LAN cable 1 to port 2 of opnSense n.1
    • FWA -> ISP2 router -> LAN cable 2 to port 2 of opnSense n.2

    Then in both opnSense i would setup failover multi-WAN and bridge them together so that one diyng will trigger the second one.

    edit: fixed small errors