Interesting take. Government policy should only favour loyal voters? Minority interest groups be damned?

People on low salaries are exactly the sort of people who would be vulnerable to being bribed by foreign adversaries.

Yeah you’re right, immediately thought I’d low balled it.

Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) sought a lead cyber security expert and advertised annual pay of £41,935

That’s fucking shocking. And after they can’t fill that role they’ll bring in a contractor and pay 4 times as much.

If she gets a retrial/appeal they will have to go through all the evidence with a fresh start, unless the prosecution withdraw their case (as what happened to Lucia De Berk).

Stop thinking of them as people, they are just meat space for brands. Like a billboard or those little posters above urinals.

I’m not sure it’s a law per se but more guidance that schools should endeavour to serve children a balanced diet which will include portions of meat/fish/poultry/dairy.

Says party donor who happens to own vegan catering business that supplies schools.

This article doesn’t explain exactly why the statistical anomaly should be inadmissable in court.

Were they asking for it to be inadmissible? My take was the RSS are implying the court allowed the jury to be misled as to its significance by not having a statistician on hand to explain it. It’s almost an exact replay of what happened in the Lucia De Berk case, later overturned and since described as “the greatest miscarriage of justice” in the Netherlands. Worth a read if you’re interested.

It’s uncanny how much of it exactly mirrors what happened to Lucia De Berk.

It’s a bit mad that we aren’t allowed to know who owns it.

These exist and are good

Any examples off the top of your head? I would assume/speculate they are fairly expensive?

20 years ago there were complaints that GP’s were using Google, now its normal. Can’t help but feel the same will happen here.

Men harming ex-partners. Unfortunately not uncommon.

Post Office shits itself whilst on life support.

If it’s russian then there is no difference.

Speaking to colleagues down south about thus and it’s an absolute cluster fuck. It’s almost certainly caused fatalities but we won’t know the exact numbers until the dust settles.

This should be treated just as harshly as if russia dropped a bomb on us.

I’m just repeating what was going round on social media a while back. His own account of when he started working for the BBC doesn’t line up with him finishing uni.

And all docs go on the gmc register during their final year (known as provisional registration), this is to allow them to do their ‘house’ jobs.

He certainly studied it for a bit, but he never graduated and has never been on the gmc register. He was in the same year as his wife who graduated in 1986 (she is on the register), he started working for the BBC in 1985…

Read between the lines. Just because the formality of identification hasn’t been stamped and filed yet doesn’t mean the journalists reporting this have no idea its him. Its clearly him, this sort of thing happens all the time. Cf “he died after a long illness” being code for “cancer”.