Can’t say I own a copy of Mein Kampf, though I’ve skimmed parts of it.
It’s one of those books that I’ll read if I feel like reading at some point, but I don’t really want a copy because of how it looks to own one lol.
Satanic Bible’s a lot better since I don’t mind associating myself with Satanism somewhat despite not being religious at all.
My bad. I assumed the web has waves with how many people surf it daily.
Can you convert that to bananas?
Wild assumption.
I don’t worship. That’s just plain stupid, at least in my opinion. Books can be read for the sake of reading them. Knowledge isn’t some weird forbidden apple on a tree. It’s something used to make informed decisions in the world.
Please seek therapy. The psychosis is strong with this. The “us vs them” mentality is nothing short of cultish brainwashing. Worship is fine, belief and faith are fine, community building is even cool, but turning it into a cult just justifies my decision to distance myself from religion more.
I don’t consider myself religious at all, but it’s a good read. Nice contrast to the BS that was shoved down my throat growing up.
As someone with the Satanic Bible sitting next to my bed, I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make.
To be fair, could be a reference to Peter Thiel’s deranged ramblings.
What’s idiotic is it makes Trump look worse because this supposed failure was his own.
Saying nothing would have resulted in this being a 24hr headline instead.
Trump’s obsession over who vetted the dude is idiotic to begin with. Who cares? Vetting isn’t a perfect process, and as long as there’s no pattern (not that this situation was indicative of issues with the vetting process anyway), then being fallible is usually forgivable.
Instead, they’re turning this from a relatively minor headline to a massive failure somehow of the Trump administration.
Why not?
Are you asking the author or people in general? If the author didn’t answer “why not” for you, then I can.
Yes, I’ve used Claude. Let’s skip that part.
If you don’t know how to write or identify defensive code, you can’t know if the LLM generated defensive code. So in order for a LLM to be trusted to generate defensive code, it needs to do so 100% of the time, or very close to that.
You seem to be under the impression that Claude does so, but you presumably can tell if code is written with sufficient guards and tests. You know to ask the LLM to evaluate and revise the code. Someone without experience will not know to ask that.
Speaking now from my experience, after using Claude for work to write tests, I came out of that project with no additional experience writing tests. I had to do another personal project after that to learn the testing library we used. Had that work project given me sufficient time to actually do the work, I’d have spent some time learning the testing library we used. That was unfortunately not the case.
The tests Claude generated were too rigid. It didn’t test important functionality of the software. It tested exact inputs/outputs using localized output values, meaning changing localizations was potentially enough to break tests. It tested cases that didn’t need to be tested, like whether certain dependency calls were done in a specific order (those calls were done in parallel anyway). It wrote some good tests, but a lot of additional tests that weren’t needed, and skipped some tests that were needed.
As a tool to help someone who already knows what they’re doing, it can be useful. It’s not a good tool for people who don’t know what they’re doing.
Well he’s the only Tesla worth mentioning. Even South America doesn’t care about the other one that supposedly exists, it seems.
Nikola Tesla? Highly influential person, made AC a thing. He passed away 80ish years ago though so not surprised you haven’t heard of him.
Homepage:
A language compiled to Bash.
Also:
A modern, type-safe programming language that catches bugs and errors at compile time.
The only puppet the US could accurately control right now, is a sock pulled onto one of Trumps hands.
Can confirm. Give him a million bucks, hell just say his makeup looks good one day, and you get a free pass to break any single law you want.
Hard to say anyone’s the US’s puppet, though the irony of using a puppet to control a puppet is pretty strong.
Switch 2 will be a better user experience for someone who knows nothing. Steam Deck is great, but you’ll need to find which games work well on it. All Switch 2 games work on the Switch 2 (assuming they aren’t crappy ports).
Apparently angered by the report, Dmitriev complained of a “well-funded, well-organised malicious media machine built to spread fake narratives, smear opponents and keep people confused”.
So it’s confirmed true then. Got it.
In the meantime, we can expect AI to be at the center of more layoff announcements —whether people believe the job cuts are solely the results of AI or not.
If the AI bubble pops, you can bet the layoffs will be the result of AI, though not in the way people usually mean by this. Honestly, as much as I don’t want to see what it does to the world, I’m still curious what would/will happen.
You simply cannot replace people with AI. The statement itself is nonsense. Even so-called “agentic” AI cannot replace an employee in all aspects of work. You would need AGI to approach that.
Like the article mentions, it’s just an excuse to fire people.
Mixins are composition! They don’t describe what a type is (“circle” is a “shape”, etc) but rather what they can do (“circle” can have its area calculated, it can be drawn, it can be serialized, etc). Mixins in Python just so happen to be implemented by adding base classes.
Inheritance itself isn’t really a problem. It usually only matters when you have unnecessarily deep hierarchies, where a change in a base class can change functionality in dozens of classes in an unintentional way. Similarly, it can add complexity once the hierarchy is deep enough, but only really if you throw too much into the base classes.
Python’s ABCs are more of interfaces though, which is why despite Python using base classes to “inherit” them, a lot of that is really composition (or putting a class together from parts) rather than inheriting and overriding implementation details from a parent/grandparent/etc type.
Assuming you’re referring to F&H 1, that came out five years before Steam reviewed this game. It’s possible they simply became more strict over time and never revisited F&H because it never came up.
Also, Steam’s rules (or any other private platform’s rules) are not law. Precedent doesn’t really matter. They can decide arbitrarily when rules apply and don’t apply (so long as they don’t violate anti-competition laws and so on). One would hope they are consistent, but being an organization with likely multiple reviewers, it’s unlikely they are always in sync, especially with decisions separated by years.
A different question to ask is whether the scene you described would have passed review in 2023. I haven’t played F&H, but based on your description, it seems unlikely.
As a retail wholesaler carrying most major brands, I think they just stock whatever people are buying. You can buy bulk Nestlé products there for example.
Best way to vote for products is still with your wallet. I’ve seen some ethical alternatives there before. Not sure what more you can do other than directly contacting them though.