TehPers

…you mean 5 years ago ?

Yes. Both are equally irrelevant to the shutdown that has been going on for only a couple months. There has only been one major set of elections since the shutdown, which was my point.

Are we going to ignore the giant national Democratic victory a few years ago?

We’re talking about the Government shutdown and SNAP benefits in this thread. There has only been one set of national elections during this shutdown.

[citation needed].

Surely you’ve read the news on the most recent elections? Or will we ignore Democrats making major victories from New York City to Mississippi?

Honestly they should have caved a long time ago. Trump and his cronies are loving the shutdown.

No, they absolutely should not have, and should continue not to. The message they should be receiving from the most recent elections is that the Republicans are losing support, not gaining it.

What they should be doing is the opposite. It is in the GOP’s best interest to reopen the government. Until they can see that their actions are losing them all of their support, ask for more.

For every additional day that someone starves due to the government’s failure to provide, ask for something to compensate them. Every additional day that people work without pay, demand something in return for them.

Eventually they will need to cave and compromise. Move the bar so far back that they have no choice but to compromise harder.

If they were capable of critical thinking, we wouldn’t be in this position to begin with. Not feeding people isn’t exactly the brightest of ideas.

This sounds like an opportunity to follow 4chan (of all things) and politely tell them to fuck off.

Eh I’ve had the exact opposite happen to me. Had a TSA agent berate me for asking if laptops stay inside the backpack while they were working with pay. It was bad enough that some lady behind me told the person to shut the fuck up.

Anyway, this is completely tangential of course. These people haven’t been paid in over a month and have to deal with fucks like her. They don’t deserve that shit.

Well, maybe the dipshit of a TSA agent I interacted with that one time deserves to deal with Nancy. But even still, that person should at least be paid.

If you believe they violated Beehaw’s rules, report them.

If you want to be in a space without moderation, then Beehaw isn’t for you. Moderation isn’t only spam filtering. If you believe that’s what moderation should be, that’s okay. But that isn’t what it is here or in almost any space.

Beehaw’s only rule is to bee nice. Surely anything that violates that rule isn’t worth any of our time to read.

Government-backed email would also help solve the “is this a bot” problem by limiting the number of email addresses that can be used, though naturally you’d also lose anonymity using that email.

There’s also the issue that if the emails are predictable, spam and phishing become much easier.

I’m mixed on this one. If we could choose the username and there’s no API for anything other than “is this a person” and your classic IMAP/SMTP stuff, then I’d be a lot more on board I think.

Is this your first time here?

Your account is brand new and you’ve already posted now three posts related to JPlus in this community in one day. Please tell me you’re joking with this one.

This post is a GitHub link to the project. Cool, I love seeing new projects, especially when the goal is to make it harder to write buggy code.

The other post is an article that immediately links to the GitHub. The GitHub contains a link at the top to, what I can tell, the same exact article. Both the article and the GitHub README explain what JPlus is and how to use it.

Why is this two posts when they contain the same information and link to each other directly at the top?

This is a distinction without a difference. Both introduce and explain how to use the project.

If they can’t find the funds, I’ll help them. Let’s see… there’s some easy funds to secure from wasteful military spending, plus the DHS is just a whole treasury of wasted funds on its own, plus there’s a few Trump bribes that, if sold, can help with funding.

How does this post differ from this one? Why make two posts for the same thing?

The numbers will probably look something like this:

“We hired N people to work on AI stuff and fired/refused to hire M people due to automation reasons”

2 years later: “We fired N people who work on AI stuff”

Somehow both of those make their stock price go up because big investors don’t make decisions grounded in the real world.

Surely agreeing to that contract was not part of the job description when they signed on. I’m curious if they could argue that the contract was signed under duress and have it voided, then sue the company for using their likeness without permission.

Because his name is Andrew and the other guy’s name is Zohran.

And yes, I’ve met people who vote this way.

I bought a license many, many years ago and loved SmartGit. I just use the cli now, but if you’re looking for a GUI, it’s a great choice.

Found you one.

While interesting, can you provide a credible source for the image? I’m not doubting that they have concepts of a plan but would certainly like to see where the image came from.