

Lemmy.MarxismLenninismMyLandisMyLand >:^[
Lemmy.MarxismLenninismMyLandisMyLand >:^[
“Gaming Candle”
Gaming Candle?
Gaming CANDLE!?!?
My dad regularly relates almost any political issue back to the most recent trump goof.
we’re fucking british
Often, however:
hi a_racist, I’m dad
it’s that zelensky is being posed in the meme as the main obstacle to peace, rather than the invading russian army.
because putins precondition for peacetalks is ukranian withdrawal from the donbass, which translates to any progress made by the ukranians since 2022.
Can’t wait for dumb investors to get bailed out again can’t have the engines of finance halt woo woo lets go.
why are you defining imperialism as the export of capital and not, idk, the use of force against other nations?
aren’t marxist-leninists supposed to be against all empire?
Under the asumption I am most people, can you give me the definition of socialism you prefer?
and are the enlightened centrists in the room with us now?
Would you like to place bets on the chance of there being a 2028 election? I won’t even ask for 1:100000 odds, I’ll happily accept 1:100
I downvoted, not due to any disagreement towards the politics, but just because the memecraft on display here is abyssmal.
Software costs nothing to copy and paste, only to design.
The term “whale” just implies a big spender, it doesn’t exlude gambling addicts, dumb children or the fiscally irresponsable.
We scrolled through the feed every couple of weeks to check what was being served up.
This is a critical flaw in the studies methodology. ‘loiter time’ is a metric used by algorithms to serve up new content, if the researchers where checking each post for signs of misogyny, then they were probably skipping by totally innocucus stuff whilst paying attention to misogyny. This (being the only feedback given) will have shown the researchers what they wanted to see.
Three months later, The Office, Star Wars, and now The Boys memes continue to punctuate the feed, now interspersed with highly sexist and misogynistic images that have have appeared in the feed without any input from the user.
It’d be good to know the actual ratios, given this was a guardian study there’s no reason to withhold data, nor a secondary source I can go and find the data. It’s possible that Facebook is simply serving up the entire spectrum of posts proportionately to their activity on the internet, or even favouring anti-sexist posts that are just not noticed/mentioned by the guardian.
Does anyone genuinely believe banning this sorta stuff is going to “end violence against women and children in one generation”?
rip marxists, the one type they make a meme with fewer than 100 words and people still complain :0