Fair argument. Though… it seems no one has a problem with OP’s post being a complete lie so long as they agree with the message.
I find this interesting. It makes me wonder if anyone that accepts this lie as a means to a better end, has ever called out any lies themselves.
I guess I’m just fascinated with hypocrisy.
I provided a link that directly disproves what OP is saying. How is it not helpful? It’s far more helpful than the original post by the merit of it not being a blatant lie.
Agriculture provenly provides roughly between 10% and a potential 20% of the pollution problem. And that’s including both livestock and equipment/vehicles. That still a lot, sure… but it’s not close to what these people would have you believe.
You’re totally fine to keep eating meat if that is what you enjoy in your diet. It’s barely making a dent in the bigger picture. Don’t let them stonewall you into changing what you enjoy just to meet their standards.
But… If you want to seriously fight greenhouse gases, and not just another vegan trying to bury the real motivation here- then go after big industry. Agriculture barely scratches what they’re doing.
Here’s more sources if you’d like, but they all just say the same thing.
https://www.rff.org/publications/explainers/agricultural-greenhouse-gas-emissions-101/
Pointing out in a reasonable manner what you did wrong so as to answer the countless times you’ve asked across 14 communities?
No, I don’t think I am. But you’re welcome to appeal to the admins of LW by reporting this response to them.
I’m not going to feed your need to debate this any further. I’ve said what I felt you needed to know.
Enjoy your…. Whatever this is.
deleted by creator
No, we aren’t.
The fundamental difference is, I’m not posting what I felt needed to be said across multiple communities and fighting with everyone that tries to tell me that this isn’t the way to go about getting one’s point across- you are.
I’m not going to argue with you. I’m just pointing out something I felt needed to be said.
Rule 5:
No baiting, sealioning, or promoting an agenda.
The fact that you’re spamming this in a bunch of community to pick fights perfectly illustrates the violation of this rule.
So… IMHO- Your post was rightfully removed and done without the irony you’re implying. Despite what you might think, It’s not authoritarian to eject disruptive content.
This reads like a paid advertisement.
Subjectively, I meant- use their authority to take them (Truth Social) down.
The democrats lacked the tenacity to ever have done it, and the criminal enterprise that currently infest our government would never cease the hardworking blowhards that fervently feed their wind-tunnel.
“….without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.”
Isn’t discrimination like, the entire purpose of what Truth Social is about?
Very moist. Very toxic. Like a 20 year old mattress, saturated in bacon grease and peppered with dip-spit.
This really could be any one of thousands of people on lemmy.
deleted by creator
Weird Al did what?
Congrats, there’s a good chance you just bought into being part of the problem. Your son is probably now a card-carrying member of the group that teases other kids for being less than.