Oh shit, I didn’t know this was a genre. I’ve only seen one channel do this style before. Here’s a video by them:

Mikhael Bakunin raps about liberal vs anarchist conceptions of freedom

https://youtu.be/pbXTpjJZGWI

Yeah, unfortunately on the internet there’s no way to truly know someone’s intentions. What you’ve written sounds legit and I’m generally of the view “trust first but rescind that trust immediately and totally if proven otherwise”. A quick browse of your profile and you seem human and genuine.

So with that said, I trust you have good honest intentions and I can see how something like this could be beneficial to people. The difficulty is that good intentions alone isn’t enough, there’s a huge potential for corruption of this idea and I’ve been around the internet long enough now to see how a small well intentioned initiative can quickly become a vast unwieldy monster. There’s a reason most instances have a near zero tolerance of adverts, because if you give an inch they’ll take a mile.

If it were contained to one thread or community (allowing for easy blocking/ignoring by those who don’t wish to see adverts, even if from real human experienced), with strict rules and moderation from the beginning, then perhaps it could be something of value to the community. However, I’m sceptical of its ability to be beneficial long term. It only takes 1 person with ill intent to find it, spread the word, and the manipulation and corruption begins.

I have no authority here, I’m just a user, that’s just my thoughts on the potential pros and cons of such an initiative. Personally, I don’t think it’s a good idea. If you go for it though, good luck, I hope it can be of benefit to the community and with vigilance the rot will be held off.

How do you prevent this idea from being corrupted?

You may have good intentions, or you may be a marketing department in disguise. Regardless, this sounds like allowing adverts into the Fediverse via the back door.

The majority of the internet is dedicated to buying and selling items, why not try enjoying this tiny space of the internet that is free from consumerism? Try making tomato sauce and sharing recipes instead of comparing bottles that are all likely made in the same factory anyway.

Labour government confirmed part of the American paedo cabal?

Oh wait, they already have been!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_of_Peter_Mandelson_and_Jeffrey_Epstein

Looks pretty obvious to me that something needs done about old folk’s driving.

Finally, my time has come!

deleted by creator

After Meta scraped all their books they have the perfect defense now. All they have to say is “we’re training a music AI” and they’re apparently untouchable.

I have reported the post a) for misinformation b) for being from a source so unreliable Wikipedia has banned it c) from a source that is racist and supported the literal 20th century German Nazi party

I included your Guardian link as evidence of the misinformation

The upvote/downvote ratio is beyond recovery now so I encourage others to do the same.

They have a broadcast licence. I expect them to be held to the standard required to maintain that licence or have it revoked.

It doesn’t say refuse work. It says refuse the concept that a person’s worth is linked to how much or what type of work they perform.

Worth as in human worth, not monetary value. Social standing, respect, etc

https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal15#targets_and_indicators

More farmers need to wake the fuck up and reject current capitalist, agrochemical, maximum yield farming or they’ll end up with nothing.

Drought and soil degradation have been known about for years, this is their job, they have no excuse for being ignorant.

Free at the point of service was a founding principle for a reason. A levy doesnt fix the root cause of the issue, and produces a myriad of other problems.

“Sense have a wide range of stakeholders including the wider public to consider when safeguarding the Sense brand reputation and hold and be seen to hold a neutral position,” the outcome notice said.

How’s this sacking doing for their brand reputation?

Will the people who did the sacking be sacked for also damaging the brand’s reputation? Y’know, for neutrality.

At 4,961,538,207 shares of National Grid PLC available on the London Stock Exchange, and their latest half-year dividend payout of 16.35p per share, that would be £811,211,497. Or £811 million in easier terms.

Their previous full year dividend was 30.88p per share, or £1,532,122,998. Or £1.5 billion.

It fluctuates each year.

Also bare in mind each individual energy provider which also profits from infrastructure investment.

Also also bare in mind that both National Grid and the energy providers are usually multinationals with shares in more than one stock exchange.

Because it’s clutter and annoying to see “Heyyy, is jellyfin a good video app?” ad nauseam, when a simple search would answer their question faster and without wasting everyone’s time and energy.

Modlogs are visible, if there’s truly a censorship issue then we’re free to upsticks and move to another community. That’s the advantage of the Fediverse.

Correction:

to pay for shareholders profits

Thank you for non-imgur link <3

What could you possibly be referring to, there’s no way Reform are disappearing vulnerable young children in the council which they control. No way at all…

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/01/more-than-50-child-asylum-seekers-still-missing-after-disappearing-from-kent-care

Pfft, the wayback machine saves 1,200,000,000,000,000 bits every day! That’s way more impressive then your piddly 150,000,000,000,000.