Perhaps that’s the level of chocolate? Like you can have 90% dark chocolate, this is 40%.
Perhaps that’s the level of chocolate? Like you can have 90% dark chocolate, this is 40%.
That’s a pretty popular opinion, actually.
Don’t worry, they’ll still use your data.
That’s what post-its are for!
Cause if it’s not on the entertainment system… they’re just going to use their phone? And being afraid of technology because of a small subset of people you assume are misusing it is a little fanatical.
So self-delusion?
In your mind, of course. Seems you have a monopoly on opinion.
They’re not, actually. Just because you only see Epic (which still has market share despite every effort they’ve made to drive people away) doesn’t mean there aren’t other storefronts.
They’re definitely part of an oligopoly, though.
As opposed to negative money?
“I prefer a quality storefront that at least presents the pretense of caring about providing a quality product to one that just wants to separate me from my money”
“What are you, some kind of fanboy?”
Taking the most positive likely option, developer salaries. Possibly repaying past investment that they used to pay salaries before they published as well.
Obviously corruption is a possibility, but it’s not the only possible answer.
Apparently they didn’t make enough money when self-publishing. At least from what I gleaned from reading the article.
I mean, trying to prove your own theory by being the perfect case study seems a little extreme…
You make a good case for your own argument.
How would you be able to tell there are more bees without mathematics?
So… a Robot Chicken sketch?
Shitty mobile game companies make a shit ton of money.
Only if you’re a rich white landowner who has financial interests at stake.
“Don’t hate the companies, hate the people who lobbied for copyright laws… the companies!”