How does not giving that ‘cool project’ money do any good?
How does not giving that ‘cool project’ money do any good?
I don’t even want to write that into a log message.
Why not? It’s a perfectly human readable representation of that duration, just as intended by ISO.
what the hell am I supposed to do with that?
Just as an example, we use that format to communicate durations between the frontend and backend.
Why would python even expose the current line number? What’s it useful for?
validators
is a shitty name for something that actually does type conversion.
People throwing thrash on the way usually is a sign of not enough trash cans in an area.
No. I regularly see trash on the ground with sometimes as much as 5 trash cans in sight that are less than 20m away.
If you cut yourself with a knife, it might be your fault. And it might be that the knife is sharp on both sides and has no handle.
It feels like I’m thirty years too young to get these jokes.
Completely depends on how often you need to write boilerplate code, and how error-prone it is.
After writing hundreds of instances of ‘fetch this from the server and show an error if it doesn’t work’, I finally wrote a helper for that. It took 2 hours, shouts at me if I use it wrong, and instantly makes my classes easier to read because all the boilerplate is gone. As an added bonus, the invocation is so small that Copilot can write it error-free, which it couldn’t before.
So fetching things is now a thing of a few seconds instead of one minute with a chance of making a mistake. I say it’s worth it.
C) Write a highly specific, custom-tailored boilerplate generator that does 80% of the work and needs only a day or two to implement.
Coding must be a nightmare if you’re choosing programming languages at random 😱
But you must also be learning quite a lot.
Programs aren’t written by a single team of developers that speak the same language. You’d be calling a library by a Hungarian with additions from an Indian in a framework developed by Germans based on original work by Mexicans.
If no-one were forcing all of them to use English by only allowing English keywords, they’d name their variables and functions in their local language and cause mayhem to readability.
[Edit:] Even with all keywords being forced to English, there’s often half-localized code.
I can’t find the source right now, but I strongly believe that Steve McConnell has a section in one of his books where he quotes a function commented in French and asks, “Can you tell the pitfall the author is warning you about? It’s something about a NullPointerException”. McConnell then advises against local languages even in comments
leveraging their games to make people buy their console when those people just want to buy the game
That’s the whole point of exclusive titles and every console vendor does it.
And triple their price? I guess the Switch is priced the way it’s priced so people can actually afford buying one.
I work in IT. We get notified when people leave.
The cruelest thing in my company is when we get to know before the person in question…
For the others: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqHh6TvGQIQ
It might be from Flight of the Phoenix (2004) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_of_the_Phoenix_(2004_film)
Just to provide some data on the radiation dose. It’s everyone’s own decision whether a ‘willy-nilly’ PET scan is worth it.
From the English Wikipedia:
FDG, which is now the standard radiotracer used for PET neuroimaging and cancer patient management, has an effective radiation dose of 14 mSv.
The amount of radiation in FDG is similar to the effective dose of spending one year in the American city of Denver, Colorado (12.4 mSv/year). […T]he whole body occupational dose limit for nuclear energy workers in the US is 50 mSv/year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography#Safety
From the German Wikipedia:
Es ist bei einer Strahlendosis von 1 Sievert (Sv), der 100 Menschen ausgesetzt sind, mit 5 Todesfällen durch Strahlenkrebs zu rechnen […]. Man müsste also 100.000 PET-Untersuchungen durchführen, um 35 Todesfälle an Strahlenkrebs (nach einer mittleren Latenzzeit von etwa 15 Jahren für Leukämie und etwa 40 Jahren für solide Tumoren) zu verursachen, das heißt etwa eine auf 3000 Untersuchungen
If 100 people received a radiation dose of 1 Sievert (Sv), one would expect 5 deaths due to radiation-induced cancer […]. One would need 100,000 PET scans in order to cause 35 cancer deaths (after a median wait duration of 15 years for leucemia and 40 years for solid tumors), which is about 1 in 3000 scans.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie#Strahlenexposition
You must have exceptionally competent first-level support.
A text editor that doesn’t assume that the keys on my keyboard are in the same order as yours.
The issue is still open. https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/issues/2795
The last comment has this: