Normally drag would agree, but outing every misogynist who doesn’t know what a woman looks like is a worthy goal

Chuds thought Aloy had a beard because she had peach fuzz. They don’t know what a real woman looks like and they don’t want to know.

He signed the law when it arrived on his desk. If he had been an ally, he wouldn’t have signed it. Drag can’t imagine Joe Biden signing a law like that, even if the house and senate approved it. Joe Stalin is held to the same standard by history.

No, not literally everyone. 10% of the population was gay back then, same as now. The institute of sexology in Germany was performing bottom surgery for trans women.

Homophobes want you to think gay acceptance is new, but it’s not. There have always been people who could tell right from wrong. Stalin wasn’t one of them.

He still banned being gay. He signed a law that made homosexuality punishable by five years imprisonment. Stalin is cancelled for being homophobic.

Incitement to violence isn’t outlawed in any country. As we’ve seen, Germany only outlaws incitement to certain forms of violence. Other forms of violence are okay.

Can’t pardon until after conviction. Hopefully the jury nullifies it before it gets to that point.

It’s not a law against violent speech. It’s only a rule against certain kinds of violent speech. Calling it a law against violent speech is misleading.

There’s no legal responsibility to shut down violent speech in any country and there never will be. All countries will always allow calls for violence.

So you’re saying that German law doesn’t prohibit all calls for violence, only certain kinds of calls for violence?

Does that also mean it’s legal to advocate violent acts against criminals, such as imprisonment?

If criminals are a designated group, and advocating violence against designated groups is illegal in Germany, does that mean it’s illegal for Germans to say criminals should be locked up?

Cowabunga!

CEOs aren’t a designated group, they’re a voluntary group. And 111 only prohibits advocating unlawful violence. It’s perfectly legal in Germany to say that criminals should be locked up. Imprisonment is a violent act, and it’s completely legal to advocate it. And criminals, just like CEOs, are not a designated group.

Brian Thompson isn’t a Dutch authority, so it’s not illegal to incite violence against him, as per your quote.

That case ruling was concerned with “lawless” action, not violent action. It’s perfectly legal to advocate forms of violence that align with the law, such as imprisonment and capital punishment.

There will never be a country that prohibits violent speech because it’s impossible.

Oh, Americans have given up on being that hopeful. Beggars can’t be choosers.

But that other company already walked back the policy to not cover anaesthesia for the whole duration of surgeries.

Did the Proud Boys not understand that the government V opposed was homophobic, Islamophobic, and hyper-christian? Did they not understand that the movie has multiple gay heroes? Did they not understand it was directed by trans women? The Proud Boys aren’t V! They’re the Party!