yeah and at 27 they burn out get depressed and commit suicide. no thanks

Well,

(x) doubt

she’s nice. You should check her out

Remember E-Mail, everyone?

and it goes HARD

The question is “What is the question?”.

here you go:

Yeah, that’s correct. Still, brushes dry much faster than sponges. So the bacteria have less time to grow.

Don’t use sponges. They have tiny holes, where bacteria live.

Use brushes instead.

Example (Amazon link)

Yes, but also, mold does grow on the sponge.

Use a different search engine?

Theoretically, yes, practically, no.

Like, if you got epilepsy, your muscles can cramp, and destroy your body tissue that way. That doesn’t mean it happens under any normal circumstances.

*than

You should make less worries about this.

:3

I’m a bit of a cat myself. 😍😍

Yes, I agree. That would be the best case.

However, I consider myself a little bit more realistic. Politics (especially in the US) will not allow for any form of socialism, be it UBI or something else, at least not in the near future. I believe that making fewer babies (contraception) is a strong handle that the people hold. Sure, people like fucking, but doesn’t determine baby count.

Yes, I see that the argument depends on the context.

Honestly, I expect some form of mass unemployment in the future coming along with mass automation.

That doesn’t mean that every job will get automated, but a large fraction (especially office jobs) will.

Also, please consider that it isn’t relevant “how many jobs there are”. It is relevant how well these jobs are paying. It would be very significant if AI took all of the well-paying “white collar” jobs, while humans are stuck with a lot of, but poorly paying, blue collar jobs and pink collar jobs.

EDIT: to whom it might concern, I believe that birth rate has to go down to keep the wages up. Because the labor market is a market, and less supply (fewer workers) = higher pay.

come here baby, I’ll do you good

I don’t believe that AI is scary.
At least, it’s no more scary than a hammer.
It’s a tool.

But I did want to point out that the argument that AI is “just a text prediction engine” is ridiculous.