

I did the swipe to complete an -ing suffix, and yes, I see the appeal!
Entering punctuation is a bit slow using long-presses on the apostrophe key. Maybe I can get used to using the symbol layer instead.
Oh! You can swipe from the 123 key to type a symbol from the symbol layer in one gesture! That’s great! It even works for comma! Kinda accidentally - given the comma position I’m swiping over question mark, backspace, comma which gets a net result of typing just the comma. I wish it would go back immediately to the ABC layer.
Moving the cursor by holding and dragging from space feels better than the similar feature in gboard!
I miss the gboard backspace feature where you can hold and drag to selectively delete.
My work is using Coderabbit, and I’ve found its feedback to be pretty helpful - especially since I’m working with a language I don’t have a whole lot of experience with (Python). I check what it tells me, but it has taught me some new things. I still want human reviews as well, but the AI can pick up on detail that is easy to skim over.
It doesn’t cover bigger picture stuff like maintainability, architecture, test coverage. Recently I reviewed a PR that was likely AI generated; I saw a number of cases where logic duplication invited future bugs. (Stuff like duplicating access predicates across CRUD handlers for the same resource, repeating the same validation logic in multiple places.) Also magic strings instead of enums, tests of dubious value. Coderabbit did not comment on those issues.
I’m also getting feedback from Sonarqube on the same project, which I think is static analysis. It’s much less helpful. It has less to say, and a lot of that is pointing out security issues in test code.