I wonder if there is anyone in the group that is actually praying or they are all just pretending for the others

If you don’t want to see others making faces, can you disable this?

more only if less is not available

there is a third case:

• they are using a programming language

Should have phrased it differently: Banning a post on a specific linux distribution is not a “ban on discussing linux” in general.

The linked article has a screenshot with a link to a post about openKylin getting removed. OP title is “Facebook ban on discussing Linux?” including the question mark. I don’t think it is accurate. At the same time I’m not defending Facebook in any way.

Discussing a specific linux distribution is not “discussing linux”.

Linking to a post on another website about a linux distribution isn’t either.

Just pull the tape?

How is this shocking or even surprising?

It was referring to this part:

some people will want to stay on Chrome. So for them, this IS a problem.

They want to keep using a product even though they don’t like it. A product that is free to use just like most of its alternatives.

They made a choice, they live with the consequences.

Maybe limiting internet usage is enough, spending extra time on a linux pc with no internet might just be an opportunity to learn something.

not only OP, look at how many replies this has

both 16 and 16 pro have 128 GB base storage

Does calling them work?

Dragons

Sounds like a good idea to disable a security feature to not be reminded of the EOL of the software you’re using /s

Are you talking about net neutrality in general, or a specific campaign that used the term? Net neutrality means all bits are equal. It does not matter where a bit is coming from, where it is going to or what it is part of.

They provide internet to the phone. What the phone does with it (e.g. provide a hotspot), is another story.

Who’s making these rules? Why do you need to assume a certain position when you encounter a special symbol?