• 0 Posts
  • 206 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 29th, 2023

help-circle


  • yeah you can’t have a ballot that someone else can force you to keep to prove how you’ve voted… anonymous, individual, untraceable ballots are essential

    though perhaps that’s could be mitigated if you could print as many ballots/receipts as you like so you can submit your real one and keep a fake one… then anyone with no care can keep their real one, and anyone being coerced can keep a fake one

    i totally agree this is the way to do it: the machines can even keep tallys for early results reporting, but the paper ballots are the only thing that actually matters. that would make subverting the electronic systems useless. it’d also be a good sanity check on the count


  • consent doesn’t just mean “yes”… consent means informed consent… consent means non-coerced consent

    my state in australia has recently implemented some fantastic new laws around consent, and have done a really good job of defining some very grey areas

    https://www.respectvictoria.vic.gov.au/news/affirmative-consent

    specifically the section about when someone can not consent is relevant here. it covers things like coercion, feeling like you can’t withdraw consent, abuse of authority (ie covers workplace sexual harassment), age, asleep/unconscious (regardless of previous consent), AND most importantly:

    Despite what a person might like to hear, they haven’t received affirmative consent if:

    • their partner cannot consent – including because of:
      • … being mistaken about the identity of any other person involved

    and in case you think that’s too restrictive, the laws have widely been praised by the BDSM and kink communities - places where non-verbal consent is common… they cover a lot of ways people might consent, and also withdraw consent

    the issue with identity is that she would not have consented if she knew all the details - facts which the man kept from her, knowing that if she knew she would likely not consent

    and that’s key: to consent, you have to have all the information available at the time







  • Pup Biru@aussie.zonetoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldWhat is Docker?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    a chroot is different, but it’s an easy way to get an idea of what docker is:

    it also contains all the libraries and binaries that reference each other, such that if you call commands they use the structure of the chroot

    this is far more relevant to a basic understanding of what docker does than explaining kernel namespaces. once you have the knowledge of “shipping around applications including dependencies”, then you can delve into isolation and other kinds of virtualisation



  • Pup Biru@aussie.zonetoMemes@lemmy.mlSchrödinger’s China
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    imminent collapse is a fairly common theme among anything we’ve learned to engineer fairly well… if a bridge isn’t in imminent danger of collapse under its theoretical maximum loading, it used too much material and was thus over-built which means fewer bridges for people

    if an economy isn’t in imminent danger of collapse then it’s resources aren’t being used efficiently and that means fewer luxuries - and bridges - for people


  • it requires a very large investment to run a node, but the fact that it’s possible means it’s open by necessity, which means we can bridge to mastodon etc

    this means that it will be a lot easier for people to migrate, since they don’t have to give up their entire social network

    imo it’s a good jumping off point: people clearly have problems with the mastodon “on ramp” and are having no issues with bsky, so imo it’s a step in the right direction and we can’t let perfect be the enemy of better