• 1 Post
  • 473 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 13th, 2024

help-circle


  • My experience with IPFS over the years has been abysmal, and I think people have said the protocol design cannot sustain any more growth, which is not even that big yet at all.

    You also cannot realistically search for files reliably by its hash, because of how files are divided into smaller pieces, whereby the method of dividing can change between clients, making the hashes incomparable. BitTorrent v2 solves this to my understanding, but almost nobody uses it for some reason.

    Often times you need to wait several minutes for IPFS to find a file, assuming it ever finds it, which sometimes fails even on two boxes next to each other.




  • All you need in order to do this is for the client to encrypt their password before sending it to the server. Often services that advertise “zero knowledge” platforms that use end-to-end encryption will authenticate their users in this way. If this were a website for example, there could be a javascript/wasm library used within the client page that encrypts their password before a login request is sent to the server.













  • refalo@programming.devtoTechnology@lemmy.mlNewpipe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I disagree, there are many resources for making and distributing android reproducible builds, including third-party F-Droid repos like IzzyOnDroid mentioned in my previous link.

    And to my knowledge there is no technical requirement that F-Droid actually needs to build OR sign packages on behalf of anyone… I haven’t seen any actual official rationale listed for it, but I assume one of the main reasons is convenience for the developers so they don’t have to provide their own builds and deal with signing/losing keys.

    I understand that the risk of problems can be somewhat mitigated in F-Droid by using reproducible builds, but I don’t consider that sufficient for the most privacy-conscious users because:

    • reproducible builds are not required by F-Droid

    • it is not made clear to the user that a particular package even supports reproducible builds

    • the verification of reproducible builds is not made plainly visible somewhere publicly if at all

    • a user can still easily be misled by a one-off rogue package that is NOT reproducible, due to the previous point

    • independent verifications of those builds reliably made by others are not common



  • In my experience… not really. I would say SDL makes the task of writing controller support code within your own applications easier and higher-level, but in reality it still has not much to do with “drivers” (I assume you mean kernel modules), which the kernel and OS stack already provide multiple unified interfaces for with things like jsdev/evdev/udev/hidapi, regardless of how you access those subsystems (via SDL or otherwise).