all of this is true with literally any company.
all of this is true with literally any company.
real linux-libre distros do not offer microcode packages because they are non-free
And never open your front door for any reason. If the cops or anyone else really needed you that bad, they’d be busting the door down anyway and you’re already fucked six ways to Sunday.
Also cameras. Lots of them. Different brands. Offline recording. INSIDE AND OUT. Ask me how I know.
I would argue they’re not safe to use because they block security updates like CPU microcode in the name of absolute freedom.
Hot Dog Linux, X11 Window Manager with Windows 3.1 Hot Dog Stand, Amiga Workbench, Atari ST GEM, Mac Classic and Aqua UI
There’s no shortage of reasons to not like Linus.
IIRC They were also trying to get kernel devs to let official structure definitions live in Rust instead of C, and got upset when they didn’t want to do that.
This would be caught by ASan and other tools though, which should be part of any review.
I’m doing that. I know several others who have as well.
Be that as it may, I personally wouldn’t consider someone to be a very knowledgeable (on how games actually work) game developer if they didn’t at least know how to use things like linear algebra to make a character run and jump naturally and such, even if they’re not coding like that day to day and just using a higher level framework.
You don’t have to agree with me, and I still respect your opinion either way.
Depends entirely on your definition of “gamedev”, IMO. If you’re trying to write a platformer in basic C with no external libraries, you will absolutely need to use algebra/geometry/etc. and maybe even some more advanced things like physics/calculus depending on what features/effects you want to put in your game.
The problem is not everyone agrees on what exactly “editorialized” and “credible” means. You’re making the same arguments they would make against you.
I think you could argue the same point with C++
To be fair, it’s entirely possible to make the same and very similar mistakes in Rust, too.
you can’t know that
I think that entire comment is actually incorrect. My understanding is that they did not “remove” any maintainers, but actually rejected patches from Russian citizens (because of their employer), and also removed some Russian names from the maintainers list who already have code in the kernel.
That doesn’t invalidate my statement though.
how is buying drugs reducing their suffering?