• 1 Post
  • 285 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 17th, 2022

help-circle

  • utopiah@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlFOSS IDEs recommendations?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Because people ask for an IDE, rather than an editor, I will say :

    Vim + terminal(s) + containerization (e.g. Docker CLI, Python venv) + live reloading (e.g. nodemon or inotify or in the browser using e.g. server side events) + repository management (e.g. git in CLI to juggle between branches, push/pull local/remotely)

    IMHO this is very VERY light (0 wait even on a RPi Zero) and yet very flexible.

    Also most of that can be “saved” via e.g screen the CLI tool, allowing to have named windows in a terminal and a lot more than to e.g. screen -raAD, locally or remotely.





  • in any way shape or form

    I’d normally accept the challenge if you didn’t add that. You did though and it, namely a system (arguably intelligent) made an image, several images in fact. The fact that we dislike or like the aesthetics of it or that the way it was done (without prompt) is different than how it currently is remains irrelevant according to your own criteria, which is none. Anyway my point with AARON isn’t about this piece of work specifically, rather that there is prior work, and this one is JUST an example. Consequently the starting point is wrong.

    Anyway… even if you did question this, I argued for more, showing that I did try numerous (more than 50) models, including very current ones. It even makes me curious if you, who is arguing for the capabilities and their progress, if you tried more models than I did and if so where can I read about it and what you learned about such attempts.



  • Image gen did not exist in any way shape or form before.

    Typical trope while promoting a “new” technology. A classic example is 1972’s AARON https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARON which, despite not being based on LLM (so not CLIP) nor even ML is still creating novel images. So… image generation has been existing since at least the 70s, more than half a century ago. I’m not saying it’s equivalent to the implementation since DALLE (it is not) but to somehow ignore the history of a research field is not doing it justice. I have also been modding https://old.reddit.com/r/computationalcrea/ since 9 years, so that’s before OpenAI was even founded, just to give some historical context. Also 2015 means 6 years before CLIP. Again, not to say this is the equivalent, solely that generative AI has a long history and thus setting back dates to grand moments like AlphaGo or DeepBlue (and on this topic I can recommend Rematch from Arte) … are very much arbitrary and in no way help to predict what’s yet to come, both in terms of what’s achievable but even the pace.

    Anyway, I don’t know what you actually tried but here is a short list of the 58 (as of today) models I tried https://fabien.benetou.fr/Content/SelfHostingArtificialIntelligence and that’s excluding the popular ones, e.g. ChatGPT, Mistal LeChat, DALLE, etc which I also tried.

    I might be making “the same mistake” but, as I hope you can see, I do keep on trying what I believe is the state of the art of a pretty much weekly basis.


  • What an impressive waste of resources. It’s portrayed as THE most important race and yet what has been delivered so far?

    Slightly better TTS or OCR, photography manipulation that is commercially unusable because sources can’t be traced, summarization that can introduce hallucinations, … sure all of that is interesting in terms of academic research, with potentially some use cases… but it’s not as if it didn’t exist before at nearly the same quality for a fraction of the resources.

    It’s a competitions where “winners” actually don’t win much, quite a ridiculous situation to be in.











  • FWIW I do use a PineTab2 on a daily basis and… it works. I can warmly recommend it but some caveats :

    • WiFi didn’t work for a while, it’s good now though (mostly stable, AFAICT no instability for me)
    • BT still does not work (not ideal if you need a mouse)
    • USB-C is a single port for charging, single port for devices, iirc usb-C hubs don’t work, only usb-C to A single converters
    • it’s… not fast, so if your workflow is a bit of Web browser or a text editor great, if it’s Blender or Gimp or anything that can be a bit demanding, it might test your patience
    • WebCam does not work, problematic if you have to do video calls

    Overall while keeping such limitations in mind, still recommended! (if you can get it shipped somehow)