• HisNoodlyServant@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    But that would require a small amount of effort. Seriously though I get some cities aren’t bike friendly (they could be though) but worked in a city that was pretty great for bikes. Small/medium sized manufacturing plant with a bunch of rednecks and almost all of them lived within 5 miles. Of course they were crying like hell when gas skyrocketed and other than me there was 2 people that biked. I think the best part is a good chunk drove gigantic trucks.

  • Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah right, keep putting this problem on “everyone” because those bigger poluting companies can do nothing to change their course of action.

    • Spzi@lemmy.click
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Aside from emissions, cycling is also healthier, safer, more pleasant for everyone else.

      I see it less of a question of “where to put the blame?” as more “in what environment we want to live?”.

      Cycling puts also less money in the pockets of bigger polluting companies, and you can still blame them on the ride for all the good reasons.

    • geissi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think this shouldn’t be read as an individual call to action as in ‘everyone has to do their part and start cycling’.
      Rather, it should be a call for governments to support a changing traffic and transportation infrastructure.

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s a chicken and egg problem. No one cycles because cycling infrastructure sucks, so politicians don’t care about cyclists so cycling infrastructure sucks. To break the pattern we need to soften things at every link of the chain. That means going somewhat our of our way to cycle and to pressure politicians to improve things.

        Personally I am currently I the process to moving to a more walkable city where I will be able to cycle to do most chores. It will increase my commute dramatically but I don’t go in every day and that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make in order to be free of my car. I tried biking in my current city but it was simply too dangerous. I was having near collisions weekly.

  • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It would also help if expensive private jets and yachts had to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. Oil industries and others need to pay for their pollution too and certainly can’t claim government money as they pollute.

  • unceme@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The great news is that infrastructure to make cities more walkable and bikeable is actually really cheap. Like, compared to car infrastructure that can move a similar amount of people it’s nothing. It’s mostly an issue of political will to actually build the stuff.

  • hex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Here’s the thing. Everyone will bike like the Dutch and the Dutch will bike even more. It’s not a question of “if.” We are already past peak oil. There will only be more wars and more climate change. Those who survive will be relying on bikes because petroleum won’t be an option anymore and electric cars are not a real solution. Cities will become more dense, suburbs will decay, in all likelihood huge parts of the US will completely collapse because life will be impossible without cars. We know petroleum is finite and there is no other technology that will replace this.

    We can prepare by rolling out infrastructure now, or we can just keep going and crash as hard as possible in to a wall. No matter what we do, we’re going to stop using gas. I hope we do it on our terms rather than waiting for tons of people to die before we fix it, but I honestly don’t have a lot of hope. But hey, some people are starting to wake up so maybe we can keep that going and save millions of lives.

      • Jazzy Vidalia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Because there isn’t enough lithium in the entire solar system to actually support everyone using electric cars at least with current technology. Even with projected advancement this won’t happen. We’re going to need better batteries using different materials. We’ll probably get to a point where renewables will supplant the current tech but it’s going to be rough.

        Also, it is very important to understand that we have probably been in the first stages of collapse for a while now. About 30 years. We just haven’t really noticed because the rot is uneven and even as societies collapse they still often continue to progress for some time in various ways. It’s just now becoming evident because it can no longer be ignored.

        As for bikes, it won’t be so bad. We’re adaptable creature and we’ll find a way to make it work. Cities will get denser and greener, but with less cars they will become quieter and more welcoming places. Public transit options will begin to become viable for the majority of people once again. There’s some hope that necessity will help drive a better future. If there is one thing humans are good at, it is adapting to their conditions.

    • will@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree we’re probably past peak oil, but i think i disagree a bit on cities becoming more dense - i think video conferencing and remote work put much less impotus on people to congregate like we once did, and yes that likely will mean more strain on the roads, but i also think the electric cars will be more like a spreading out of electric storage and transmission than 100% used for transportation. (Again due to increasing popularity of remote work) having a store of electricity will be posh and help guard with the rolling brownouts due to climate change and terrorism interrupting the grid.

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    You can ride a bike to work or the store around here, but you’ll be walking home. Bikes are way too easy to quietly steal.

    • hex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Bicycle theft is also a problem in the Netherlands, but they still do it. There are also lots of people not in the Netherlands who bike to work and don’t have their bikes stolen.

      That’s not the problem. The problem is car culture.

      In the Netherlands they have functional bike parking, which makes it a lot harder to steal bikes. They also use wheel locks, which are much harder to cut without damaging the bike. There are also sites like bike index that let you track your bike serial number in case it gets stolen. If you use bike index and your bike is stolen there’s actually a pretty good chance it will be returned. Also, if you buy a bike check it on bike index first to see if it’s stolen.

    • chickpeaze@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      While I’m a card carrying bike nut and plant-based eater, I feel we can make more of a difference encouraging people to do things that are less all in.

      Work commute too far right now? Maybe start replacing the small car trips with bike trips.

      Veganism unthinkable? Maybe try a meatless day or two a week.

      Something people can wrap their heads around, and after trying, realise they haven’t died.

  • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I like this idea in principle, but the annual CO2 emissions for 2018 was about 35 billion tons. This makes the drop barely even impact our total production, let alone be enough to stop global warming.

    It’s still a worthy goal, but we’d be better off focusing on bigger wins, where even a few percent of carbon reductions would dwarf this number (or pushing for both).

    • olbaidiablo @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      This may work in the Netherlands, but in my country (Canada) where it’s a 2 hour drive to the next city, it simply isn’t feasible. I do, however, wish that my city was much more bicycle friendly and we had easier and cheaper options for bikes that could be enclosed from the weather.

  • Cowbob45@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yes but not everyone lives in a flatland like the dutch do, I believe I could fully transition to a bicycle if cars weren’t the top priority on my city, but I know many friends that live in parts of the city that are basically mountains.

    • karce@wizanons.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ebikes are definitely the answer. Much easier to ride up hills and very accessible for regular people to start riding. Plus they are significantly cheaper than cars when you account for insurance and registration and maintenance, etc.