Like a never-ending arms race, the price to become president has skyrocketed.

In 2020, almost $6 billion was spent on the presidential race alone, roughly four times what it cost two decades ago. (Even adjusting for inflation, it cost almost three times as much as in 2000.)

Including congressional races, the cost was more than $14 billion, double that of 2016.

In the last open GOP primary in 2016, candidates spent roughly $400 million, followed closely by super PACs, for $768 million in total primary spending, according to the former Campaign Finance Institute (which has since merged with Open Secrets).

In this cycle, candidate spending is expected to jump to at least $500 million with super PACs again spending about the same or a little less than the campaigns.

  • Valliac@beehaw.orgEnglish
    7·
    2 years ago

    Why can’t we do like the UK does?

    • You can only campaign for a certain period of time (like, a month or two iirc)
    • You have a hard limit of what you can spend on said campaign
    • TV stations must give equal TV time to both parties, and parties can’t start campaigning until a certain period after the election is announced.
    • EDIT: and they use ranked choice voting.

    (I’m in the US so I’m pulling a lot of this from memory, please correct me if I’m wrong)

    Yeah, people may still vote for an idiot. But it’s an idiot they voted for, and not one that was bought for some company for tax breaks.

    • Nanokindled@beehaw.orgEnglish
      2·
      2 years ago

      The UK isn’t even the best example of this. Denmark. Does it better. Campaign posters have to follow a specific format, can only be posted in specific places, and all candidates are publicly funded. Elections are cheap, quick, and (relatively) honest. Plus it’s much harder to become a celebrity politician, or an extremely rich one.

      • Valliac@beehaw.orgEnglish
        1·
        2 years ago

        Thanks for the info. I had a vague idea of UK elections, but didn’t realize the specifics of other countries.