overload@sopuli.xyz to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-21 day agoWe all know grammar Nazis. What incorrect grammar are you completely in defence of?message-squaremessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up138arrow-down1message-squareWe all know grammar Nazis. What incorrect grammar are you completely in defence of?overload@sopuli.xyz to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-21 day agomessage-square123fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareoverload@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·edit-21 day agoI think if I took it too far and said that all contractions are basically acceptable, y’all’d’n’t’ve agreed with me.
minus-squareTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 hours agoI use this one unironically lol
minus-squareForester@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoYou all did not have
minus-squarekryptonite@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 day agoIt would be “You all would not have” because “You all did not have agreed with me” doesn’t make sense.
minus-squareℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·15 hours agoAnd I understood it perfectly the first time, which makes it acceptable by my lights.
minus-squareBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 day agoI’d’n’t’ve had a single issue with it. In fact, I quite enjoy multi-contractions
I think if I took it too far and said that all contractions are basically acceptable, y’all’d’n’t’ve agreed with me.
I use this one unironically lol
This looks aggressively welsh.
You all did not have
It would be “You all would not have” because “You all did not have agreed with me” doesn’t make sense.
And I understood it perfectly the first time, which makes it acceptable by my lights.
I’d’n’t’ve had a single issue with it. In fact, I quite enjoy multi-contractions