Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1724arrow-down112
arrow-up1712arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squareHeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 years agoThat’s funny… until I actually think about a 2.5in diameter turd… then I’m horrified.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·2 years agoPretty much this size
minus-squareurinnerchild87@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoI think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years ago2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
minus-squareJohandea@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·2 years agoCan you please start using real units. Seriously.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoIt’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoNo. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
minus-squarenonailsleft@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 years agoThey should just refer to the caliber
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoRelevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoI googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years ago2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years ago1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
minus-squareSnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoThat doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
minus-squarePickTheStick@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoLol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?
That’s funny… until I actually think about a 2.5in diameter turd… then I’m horrified.
Pretty much this size
I think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
Can you please start using real units. Seriously.
It’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
No. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
They should just refer to the caliber
I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?