Recent news revealed that Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has been investing heavily in military tech companies, which adds another ethical layer to a platform already criticized for how little it pays musicians !

Spotify only pays artists about $3–5 per 1,000 streams, using a pro-rata model that directs most money toward major stars… By contrast, Qobuz (≈$18–20 per 1,000 streams) and Tidal (≈$12–13) pay far more fairly!

However Tidal is far from ethical. Most of its revenue is controlled by private investors and founders and small artists still earn very little…

More fair-minded platforms like Bandcamp, Resonate, Ampled, or SoundCloud’s fan-powered royalties prioritize musicians over investors.

With these more ethical alternatives available, why do we keep using Spotify?

  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I hope you enjoyed feeling like you had a “gotcha” moment. When on my computer, yeah, I watch some YouTube, but mostly news and late-night monologues. I sure as shit don’t pay for it.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I have no interest in “gotcha moments”. Just having a discussion about the virtues of streaming music platforms vs. buying.

      If you don’t pay for it then you are pirating, which is a whole other discussion.

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “If you don’t pay for it then you are pirating” is not a discussion, it’s an erroneous blanket statement.