• waz@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    More sloppy reporting from the guardian, at least proof read the work. Tax £66,610 on an £85,000 vehicle? 3 times as much as the cost in the uk of £3200? I think someone put another 0 on that, and they still managed to publish it.

    • HermitBee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m not sure what the mistake is? France charge a £50k premium, so £66k tax doesn’t sound unreasonable.

      It doesn’t say that that £66k is 3 times the cost, it says there are 13 countries which have a greater acquisition tax than 3x the UK rate. As far as I can see, it doesn’t mention the relative costs between the UK and France.

      • waz@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If it’s mean to be a single digit multiple of the uk tax, at 3k, then it can’t be 66k

        • HermitBee@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s not meant to be a single digit multiple of the UK tax, I don’t know where you’re getting that from. The things which the article mentions as being single digit multiples are:

          In 13 countries, acquisition taxes for such an SUV are more than three times higher than the UK’s

          £3,200 in the UK, but the sale would incur taxes of £66,600 in France – driving UK SUV sales to four times the level in France.

          And the headline figure is “up to 20 times”, which roughly matches the £66k.