You know I read some more articles on there and it really is biased but so are more mainstream sources. I would like to see more sources cited (some srticles are better than others) like here there are a lot of claims with no source to back them up (even if some of the claims are true). The whole website appears more like an opinion piece than a source of reliable information
Some articles are more in-depth and well-sourced, others not so much. It’s a volunteer project. You can also look at, say, the article on The People’s Republic of China, which has 132 sources listed. It’s an attempt at creating a pro-communist, Marxist-Leninist wiki that is well-sourced and fact-based, and thus the more important topics get filled out first.
You know I read some more articles on there and it really is biased but so are more mainstream sources. I would like to see more sources cited (some srticles are better than others) like here there are a lot of claims with no source to back them up (even if some of the claims are true). The whole website appears more like an opinion piece than a source of reliable information
Some articles are more in-depth and well-sourced, others not so much. It’s a volunteer project. You can also look at, say, the article on The People’s Republic of China, which has 132 sources listed. It’s an attempt at creating a pro-communist, Marxist-Leninist wiki that is well-sourced and fact-based, and thus the more important topics get filled out first.