Jeena@piefed.jeena.net to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoAre monorepos really simpler?www.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down12
arrow-up172arrow-down1external-linkAre monorepos really simpler?www.youtube.comJeena@piefed.jeena.net to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squarePup Biru@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-27 hours agothat’s a good and bad thing though… it’s easy to reference code, so it leads to tight coupling it’s easy to reference code, so let’s pull this out into a separately testable, well-documented, reusable library my main reason for ever using a monorepo is to separate out a bunch of shared libraries into real libraries, and still be able to have eg HMR
that’s a good and bad thing though…
it’s easy to reference code, so it leads to tight coupling
it’s easy to reference code, so let’s pull this out into a separately testable, well-documented, reusable library
my main reason for ever using a monorepo is to separate out a bunch of shared libraries into real libraries, and still be able to have eg HMR