• unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Here’s a video from the gig. I think it would have been more clear they were targeting anti-zionism if they had used that combined symbol on the flag and just stuck with swastikas over the eyes. In context it does seem like they’re being critical of Israel here while using symbolism pulled from the Israeli flag though.

    If only there was something Israel could do to stop the comparisons of Israelis to genocidal Nazis.

    • CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m sure it was anti genocide/ anti Zionism they were going for but they fucked up by using the Star of David. That pretty clearly targets the religion not the country.

        • CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s a very good point. And the flag kinda sums up Israel’s strategic conflation of anti Israel with anti Semitism.

          I’m guessing from the phrasing of the article that this was the Star of David outside of the flag. Which I think is asking for an accusation of anti Semitism and could have been easily avoided.

          • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Which I think is asking for an accusation of anti Semitism and could have been easily avoided.

            Which is exactly why they’ve conflated Zionism with Judaism for 4/5 of a century. Fuck that.

      • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes it was about antizionism, the pictures didn’t end after the star of David/swastika thing. The band is fairly direct about thier criticism with what they showed, even by the Guardian’s description.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      A star of David entwined with a swastika? Clearly, without a doubt anti-Semitic. It’s saying “Jews are Nazis”.

      If you want to convey an anti-zionist message and don’t hate Jews, it’s actually quite easy. Yeah, Israel will still accuse you of being anti-Semitic but they say Jews are anti-semitic if they dare suggest genocide of Palestinians is a bad thing, so we don’t go by that.

      People are pushing back on Israel’s “all criticism of Israel is racist” with “no criticism of Israel is racist”. Be fucking better. Stop condoning racism because it aligns with your politics.

      • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        What’s on the Israeli flag…? Y’know, the flag that represent a country? What’s on it again…? I just plain forgot.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          So do you think that Israel and Jews or Judaism are one and the same? No?

          The symbols are not the same. A swastika emblazoned on an Israeli flag would be a completely different statement.

          You know, just the same as there’d be a difference between displaying an alteration of any religious symbol that implies its members are all evil, and displaying an alteration of a flag featuring that symbol. Many flags feature religious symbols.

          • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            That’s the problem with creating an ethnostate, suddenly there is conflation between the actions of the nation and its chosen identity. The Star of David is at once a symbol of the religion and the state of israel. The state of israel set these conditions. The symbol can stand for both separately and interrogated/criticized/respected/etc distinctly. You’re doing the Knesset’s work for them.

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah that’s a problem with Israel.

              Doesn’t absolve everyone else of the responsibility not to be racist tho.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      a jewish religious symbol mashed together with a nazi symbol can easily be interpreted as anti-jew racism

      i’m guessing there was no similar islamic symbol representing the genocidal intents and actions of many islamic terrorist movements and countries

      another edgy group of musicians jumping on the populist bandwagon. they live in this minuscule bubble of protest against a single action, disconnected from the rest of history and the actions of others and the implications of their protest. when asked to do so they get deeply offended; lash out and implicate you in the same action, or accuse you of what-aboutism ;)

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That is the newspaper’s job sometimes. Offer another view of the facts with a bias different from your own.

      If no one is pissed off at the newspaper then the newspaper isn’t doing their job.

      • unmagical@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        News’ job is to report facts. If one person says it’s raining and another says it’s not the journalist should go outside and check, not just report “he said, she said” bullshit.

        • CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Never heard of an opinion piece? Reporting people’s takes on a situation is very much part of journalism along with factual news.

          When it’s done well, it can be really powerful and informative.

          • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Opinion/editorial and News usually have what’s called a firewall between the two departments at a newspaper. They never work together. This is news, not an opinion piece.

            • CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Did I say that?

              Journalism provides information and understanding. That’s it’s whole thing. The Information bit tends to be clear - it’s verifiable, you can see if it’s raining as in your example. Understanding is harder - it’s intangible, you infer it or deduce it. Therefore it’s non-objective, unprovable, so an opinion.

              And lots of things fall into the second category - An article on what Putin’s actual objectives are in Ukraine. Why his world view became that way. What it feels like to be a Uyghur in China. What it’s like in the inside of the Trump administration. This kind of thing is valuable and it’s only communicated through opinion pieces.

              I think people react strongly to it because it is something that can be weaponised and has been. Mixed in or presented as informational news. Or might just be advocating some dogshit idea or rotten agenda. There’s too many examples to mention…

  • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Entwining a Star of David with a swastika implies that Jews are Nazis and risks encouraging hatred of Jews.

    The Star of David is a sacred symbol of Jewish identity; the swastika is the emblem of a genocidal regime responsible for the murder of 6 million Jews. To merge these two symbols is an act of profound malice, desecration, and cruelty. It is antisemitism in its starkest form.

    Are there any other political entities that use that symbol? Perhaps a Nazi entity? I actually notice in the article that they make reference to other political entities.

    As the band performed the song, pictures of political figures, including the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the US president, Donald Trump

    Images of the destruction in Gaza were also shown on screen. The video concluded with the words: “Our government is complicit in genocide.”

    Oh yeah, come to think of it, Israel, a Nazi state, uses the Star of David as their icon. Given the evidence, it seems more likely the band was actually referencing Israel. I wonder why the author didn’t make that connection.

    • Denjin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately The Guardian, though probably The British newspaper most critical of Israel, has also fallen victim of the zionist lobby’s push to conflate anti-zionism with anti-semitism.

      It’s now practically impossible to say anything in the public space in this country that condemns the policies of the nation of Israel without being drowned out by millions of voices calling you a jew hater.

      As can be evidenced by the Maccabi Tel Aviv supporter fiasco where the police who took steps to ban their supporters because of their violent actions have the narrative completely turned 180 by even the prime minister himself.