Jamesj999 Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前

title

i.imgur.com

message-square
95
fedilink
789

title

i.imgur.com

𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前
message-square
95
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    Not just guys, let me tell you

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 年前

      Yeah I definitely want one

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 年前

        I mean, if anyone, Captain Lezbian is the person who needs to have one

    • Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 年前

      Guys is technically a non-gendered term - FWIW

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 年前

        I haven’t seen it used much in a non-gendered way, so I guess that’s why it has a clear masculine ring in my head

        • JoShmoe@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 年前

          It is very common to hear girls use the term guys, and for people to address a mixed party as “guys”

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        Just like ‘mankind’ right? (/s)

        Sure, language is changing and guys has been veering neutral since the 70s. But claiming the word is outright “non-gendered” is incorrect imo.

        • CallumWells@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 年前

          Merriam-Webster would like to disagree with your assertion that it is not “non-gendered”

          Thanks to @Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world for the link in https://lemmy.ml/comment/7077751 (I don’t know if I could make that link in a better way)

          • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 年前

            I agree that “guys” is not a gendered term but I don’t like your argument.

            Definitions of words can be very different to how people use them, and we shouldn’t constrain the use of words to their definitions.

            • CallumWells@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 年前

              I disagree that we shouldn’t constrain the use of words to their definitions. It’s what helps make the meaning of sentences the most clear for everyone. If people had actually done that then the definition of “literally” wouldn’t include “figuratively” and a lot of misunderstandings could be avoided.

              Otherwise we could end up with people saying that when they wrote “all white people deserve to die” what they actually meant was that they deserve to live, since that’s how they use the word “die”. It’s nonsensical to me.

        • Senshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          Kind of a bad example, because mankind very clearly stems from ‘humankind’. And people are lazy and prefer using short words. The unfairness is rather that women got stuck with the words requiring more characters. But that is a phenomenon of the English language and not present in others.

          However, in most languages the words for man/male are closer to human(kind) than female/woman, which very clearly shows the historic patriarchal influence, coming back around to your point after all.

          • CallumWells@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 年前

            Interestingly enough, in old English you had “werman” and “wifman” for man and woman respectively, in which case referring to all with “mankind” makes perfect sense. So the originator for mankind seems more likely to be from that than the explanation that it’s a shortening of “humankind” to me.

      • hughesdikus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        Not technically. Practically. In real world. As slang.

        Cause technically and by definition, It’s still very much gendered.

        • Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 年前

          No, sorry. Please check the facts before correcting someone.

          In its plural form “guys” is technically non-gendered:

          https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/guy

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        What’s gals then?

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 年前

      Oh good, so it’s just the OP who doesn’t have their shit straight.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 年前

      Nicole Coenen has joined the chat

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 年前

    96 volt? This thing fucks

  • eluvatar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 年前

    Hell yeah

    • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 年前

      Hell yeah

  • Slatlun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 年前

    I’ll take weapons that are as dangerous to the wielder as anyone else for $500…

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 年前

      You could say it’s a double-edged sword

      • CallumWells@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 年前

        I think that one may have more than two edges XD

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      Even Warhammer 40000 chainswords usually have the blade shielded from the wielder’s side. Yes, even the chaos and ork ones.

      • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        It’s made for plunge cuts!

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      deleted by creator

  • t_berium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    Holy Chainsword, blessed be thy Machine Spirit

  • Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 年前

    Hell yeah

  • nick@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 年前

    For the emperor

    • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD

      • nick@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE

  • Dazed_Confused@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 年前

    the Emperor protects!

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 年前

      Not Cadia tho

      • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 年前

        The planet broke before the Guard did.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 年前

          According to the Minka Lesk omnibus after the Cadia destruction they did broke for a time before gathering their remains and losing half of their remaining numbers in incredibly suicidal but spectacular attack just to show the rest of Guard they didn’t lost the edge.

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 年前

    If I pull this out of a stump do I get to be king?

    It’s a cool shelf piece but in terms of practicality I’m to attached to my extremities to dare to turn it on

    • Possible_EmuWrangler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 年前

      Listen, strange women lyin’ near trees distributin’ swords is no basis for a system of government. That said, if you do pull it from a stump I’m not going to try and take it from you.

    • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 年前

      Excalumber

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 年前

      King of the lumberyard

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 年前

    Is it time to rip and tear?

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 年前

    Aesthetically? Hell yeah. Functionally? I am not taking a sword that can run out of juice to the battlefield.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      This is the kind of weapon you bring to a battle expected to be so bloody you die before it does

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 年前

      a back-mounted generator is still an option, although it just prolongs the inevitable.

  • baatliwala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 年前

    Please tell me the Chainsword is a weapon in some game?

    • goldenex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 年前

      Any Warhammer game

    • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      You poor sweet summer child…

    • Thteven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 年前

      Oh boy, is it ever

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Fallout series be like

  • TheDeepState@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 年前

    Hell yeah!

  • Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 个月前

    deleted by creator

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 年前

    People are supposed to see Kite Man and think “hell yeah.”

Memes@lemmy.ml

memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.14K users / day
  • 2.52K users / week
  • 5.88K users / month
  • 16.5K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 53.5K subscribers
  • 14.9K Posts
  • 320K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org