Palworld continues to break records on Steam, racking up 1,864,421 unique concurrent players in the past 24 hours. At least 4 of those uniques are in the Nexus Mods offices, where after-hours ‘research’ is being conducted.

Whether you think this game has arrived out of the blue, or was an obvious hit, one thing is clear; It bears a lot of similarity to an existing game franchise you may have encountered, namely Pokémon. We won’t go into detail about potential similarities; suffice to say that enough significant likeness exists in the base games to require clarification when it comes to modding the game.

We do think that adding Pokémon content to Palworld is a very cool idea and we understand why people would want such a thing. However, we’re not comfortable hosting this content at Nexus Mods.

As you may know, Nintendo (who jointly own the Pokémon franchise) have a consistent record of mercilessly submitting legal challenges, DMCAs and takedowns against fan-made content.

Given Palworld’s similarity to the Pokémon franchise as a base game, hosting content that adds Pokémon copyrighted characters or assets into the game is almost certainly going to put us at risk of legal action. Palworld content that is uploaded to Nexus Mods and is considered to have Pokémon-derived characters or assets will be taken down. Our normal moderation policies will apply.

We don’t think it’s worth the risk to allow this content to be shared in our community. At best we would have to deal with the headache of legal threats from Nintendo and at worst they may seek to take action against us and the uploaders of the mods directly.

There are many creative opportunities to explore mods for this game that add to the world and gameplay, but do not infringe on existing IP so obviously. You are encouraged to explore these modding directions freely.

We are looking to support Palworld modding in any way that we can and we have already released Vortex mod manager support for Palworld. We also encourage you to visit us in our Palworld modding forums.

All of us here at Nexus Mods are really excited to see what the PalWorld modding community comes up with.

  • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 months ago

    I really couldn’t care less about this game, but this is a based stance to ensure the game’s longevity

    • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      You mean their site’s longevity. This won’t affect the game either way.

      Also, mods of these type will always exists anyway, and Palworld would end being even more popular thanks to that (unless they start with the classic early access bullshit from other games).

      • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Wouldn’t a mod like that risk the game being taken down due to copyright infringement or something similar? As I understood it, using Pokemon in a mod isn’t bad in and of itself, but because of the combination with a “Pokemon-derivative” game it would be problematic to host the mods

        • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          Usually these cosmetic mods only work for yourself. You modify your client files to replace certain models and textures. Only for your client. No one else would notice you’re running mods and everything would be perfectly normal for everyone else. And unless DRM is a thing in this game, not even the devs would notice.

          Devs can demand to take down mods, they could also kill all mods for good if they wish. They are not being affected by copyright at all. Not even with their original game. Is not a clone of a Nintendo game, their aren’t using their licenced characters or assets. Not even their game modes are similar.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve never played a pokemon but the madness around this game is enticing. Seems like this is the game that players have been waiting for that Nintendo just didn’t want to make.

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s a good game. It’s basically ARK, but with NPC humans, pokeballs to store your monsters in (so nice), and removal of the (imo) annoying over-focus on PvP. I’ve also been having a LOT more fun with base-building in Palworld, especially in terms of having cosmetic items to place, to really make your base feel “lived in”.

        • Gamma@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          The fact that you unlock furniture sets and you don’t have to make some Frankenstein’d bed out of benches and boxes puts it so much higher than Ark!

      • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve only very surface-level knowledge of the game, but to me it seems like an amalgam of all kinds of early access games. It seems to offer a little bit of everything but not a whole lot of depth. I might be wrong, so do feel free to weigh in and tell me if anyone’s up for it

        • Orvorn@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re not entirely wrong but the Pal system itself has a good amount of depth - Pals have traits and skills, and are weaker or stronger against different other types of Pals, so you can be very clever about what skills you teach them and what fights/environments you take them into. The game can get very easy if you exploit this system properly but is quite challenging if you ignore Pal stats and just grind levels and gear.

  • sarsaparilyptus@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    One of the countless reasons we need to repeal the DMCA and change copyright expiration to set in after 25 years

    • Truck_kun@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      All for reducing copyright to 25 years or less.

      DMCA… I’m a bit fuzzy on the details, been a while, and the media mostly talks about DMCA take down notices. DMCA includes the clauses that prevent people from tinkering and modifying things they bought/own if manufacturers put any preventative measures in place right (including repairing)? If so, I’m fully up for revisiting that.

      But never, NEVER, NEVER touch Section 230. And anyone attacking it is likely being disingenuous , or doesn’t really understand how Section 230 and the internet work (and are unlikely to write better legislation).

    • falsemirror@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Love the spirit, but the DMCA is a mixed bag.

      Section 512 may allow for takedowns, but it also ensures web hosts face limited liability and aren’t litigated into hell when a user shares a spongebob meme. Really it’s up to sites to identify and defend fair use when they recieve takedowns, and imo excessive requests on fair use material should be harshly penalized.

      Section 1201, which makes it a crime to tamper with DRM however must be destroyed.