• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Spying” implies the user doesn’t know about it.

    Virtually every platform collects this information, partly as a service to the user, so I don’t think it’s completely ridiculous.

    One thing I do appreciate about Nintendo is that it works completely offline so if you don’t want them to have any info about you, you can keep it.

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Idky you got downvoted, you are correct.

      These metrics are very much public, sometimes bragworthy/touted, and yes while technically a little creepy it does effectively deal with the scalper problem.

      I hate shit that must connect to servers & cannot be played offline. As Louis Rossmann says, this begs the question – do you even own what you bought & paid for? Or is it a license they can take away next time you come online?

      I love Nintendo, I also have so many fucking gripes about Nintendo, but that’s not one of their flaws. I have always been able to play all their stuff offline with no problems whatsoever. 🙂 That should be the norm, but it isn’t, and Nintendo is exceptional in this regard.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        My friends can all see how much I’ve played my Steam games and I don’t see anyone complaining about that.

        • Panamalt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Steam isn’t currently trying to use your playtime as a way to determine what you can and cannot buy

              • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                You’re giving the wrong reinforcement for the wrong reason. You’re afraid of what they may do in several years, so you’re negatively reinforcing the good decision they’re making right now. You should, instead, give them positive reinforcement for making good decisions so that they continue to make good decisions. What you’re currently doing is discouraging them from making public statements about their policy changes.

                • Panamalt@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  I don’t think Nintendo gives a flying fuck about my ‘reinforcement’, positive or negative. All I’m trying to do issue a warning about where these kinds of decisions and policies can very quickly end up.

                  Today, it may be a good thing (I would argue its not, but not the point rn), but as soon a money can be made, they will weaponize it. It’s what capitalism does.