Recent news revealed that Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has been investing heavily in military tech companies, which adds another ethical layer to a platform already criticized for how little it pays musicians !

Spotify only pays artists about $3–5 per 1,000 streams, using a pro-rata model that directs most money toward major stars… By contrast, Qobuz (≈$18–20 per 1,000 streams) and Tidal (≈$12–13) pay far more fairly!

However Tidal is far from ethical. Most of its revenue is controlled by private investors and founders and small artists still earn very little…

More fair-minded platforms like Bandcamp, Resonate, Ampled, or SoundCloud’s fan-powered royalties prioritize musicians over investors.

With these more ethical alternatives available, why do we keep using Spotify?

  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My music collection spans some 1,700 tracks and several full albums. It’s not difficult to create local playlists, I don’t pay monthly, and I don’t have an excessive data plan because I need streaming. Look at the knock-on costs. It’s not $12/month.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I listen to probably at least a dozen new songs every day. If I bought them that would cost me $18/day. Or $540/mo. Not to mention the absolute fortune required to store them all locally.

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m in the phase of my life where if I encounter a new track I like in the wild, I’ll buy it. But I’m not seeking out new stuff because (cracks open a PBR and grows a goatee) everything feels homogenized today.

        Perhaps it’s just different use cases. Still, you’re dependent on a company to be able to continue listening to the music you like. That’s worrisome. If a company took away the collection I’ve been building since the '80s, livid wouldn’t begin to explain my reaction.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          if I encounter a new track I like in the wild, I’ll buy it.

          How do you “encounter” new tracks?

          But I’m not seeking out new stuff because…everything feels homogenized today.

          If you’re not actively seeking out new music, it will feel that way, because you’re just listening to whatever is on the radio or on TV or whatever. This is the beauty of streaming platforms. In the past you were only ever exposed to whatever music the record companies decided you should hear. And it was almost exclusively homogenous “pop” music, to some degree. With streaming music you can discover new music every day based on your personal preferences.

          • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            OK. Lots of assumptions here. I haven’t listened to the radio since the '90s, and I’ve never paid for cable.

            My preferred genres are progressive house and trance, and I got into the rave scene about the time I stopped listening to the radio. I started my collection via fservs on IRC, ratio FTP sites and then Napster and P2P, totally obviating the record labels. I’m subscribed to various music producers on YouTube for when I’m thinking I want something new, and if it makes me cry, off to Beatport I go.

            So, like, not to be rude, but you got every assumption wrong.