It also works with JavaScript-heavy websites like Mastodon and Youtube, which the standard “Save Page” feature implemented in all browsers usually fails to save, though some features like collapsibles are missing.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Post text elaborates on it. Standard Save page option commonly fails to preserve JavaScript elements.

  • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I use this to save the job listing of every job I apply to, for reference when I get a call back and the listing has been taken down. You can highlight a section of the page and it smartly saves just the page content needed to contain the highlighted portion. Really keeps the size down.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Am I missing something? How is this different from CTRL+S

    Edit: clicked on link and saw demo video. Pretty cool, saves all images and assets without having that big folder of stuff

    • e0qdk@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This takes a snapshot of the HTML elements from when they were loaded in your browser. If the page loads content dynamically, HTTrack won’t save it but this can. (i.e. this works better on crappy modern sites that need JS to even just load the article text…)

  • goodboyjojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    that’s cool. also you can use stuff like htrack to backup web pages and make them into zim files for software like kiwix

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      A property secured site won’t serve its css and js when requested from a non configured domain (such as localhost), so the html is the only part that will work when you save the page as.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Selecting “Save as” is not the same as “view while offline”.

        “Save as” is just a legacy function that has been passed down to Save the HTML into a file. It’s not used to “save” pages or sites to view offline.

        The ability to properly Save a page to view offline is already included in most browsers. Even Edge has that functionality built into it.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          24 hours ago

          The ability to properly Save a page to view offline is already included in most browsers. Even Edge has that functionality built into it.

          Go ahead and show the classroom what you’re talking about…

  • nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s the use case? I can’t imagine why I would want to save the interface on a YouTube page, or any similar interactive page. If anything I’d just want the relevant media or text.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is youtube what people see as “the internet” nowadays? There are millions of websites out there with unimaginable troves of valuable information that isnt available anywhere else. When you actually do anything productive like research, art, engineering, cooking, etc. you often look for very specific info and when you find it you might want to archive it, because websites constantly just disappear forever, never to be seen again. Preserving the exact formatting is often very important too.

      • nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This doesn’t answer my question. There were two examples given in the OP, YouTube and Mastodon (which I don’t use).

        Research, engineering, and cooking are all things I do and I can’t think of a case where I’d want to save all the Javascript on a web page. If anything most interfaces are way too heavy these days. Usually saving a media file, or a pdf, or copy/ pasting text, or at most a screenshot is perfectly fine.

        What do you end up using this for?

        • kjetil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Probably youtube is just a bad example in this case. But javascript heavy pages were regular SaveAs doesn’t really work definitely exist, and the value is in preserving those websites information and formatting

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I use it to save Reddit comments. I use RES enhancement, which lets me get all the comments on one page, then I save it. That ensures I get all of the images, and comments in one easy to reference file.

    • danekrae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just listened to an audiobook, where the author constantly said “you can find a free example of this on the website”, but the material is no longer available on the website. At least not for free.