• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Prolewiki is a Marxist-Leninist wikipedia, you can check the sources directly if you want. My point is that, again, media isn’t popular by merit but by exposure, as private media cares only about its own profits.

    What on the prolewiki link is wrong? It is biased, just like wikipedia is, but that doesn’t mean the information is wrong, either.

    • PolarPirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You know I read some more articles on there and it really is biased but so are more mainstream sources. I would like to see more sources cited (some srticles are better than others) like here there are a lot of claims with no source to back them up (even if some of the claims are true). The whole website appears more like an opinion piece than a source of reliable information

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Some articles are more in-depth and well-sourced, others not so much. It’s a volunteer project. You can also look at, say, the article on The People’s Republic of China, which has 132 sources listed. It’s an attempt at creating a pro-communist, Marxist-Leninist wiki that is well-sourced and fact-based, and thus the more important topics get filled out first.