If you were to go out today and buy an open source smart watch to pair with a GrapheneOS phone which would you choose?

  • DishonestBirb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    If you care about actual functionality (accurate HR, fitness tracking, GPS tracking for runs) but still don’t want to be spied on, using GadgetBridge with a commercially available watch (Huawei/Garmin/Amazfit) is probably your best option. GadgetBridge being the controller/gatekeeper app to the watch means all your data stays on your device and isn’t going to the watch manufacturer, but you still get the benefit of the actual functionality working well (which, unfortunately with Pebble or PineTime isn’t the case right now - pebble being very old iirc and pine time just… Not being good.)

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I recommend a different consideration than the usual design, battery life, OSHW, etc : connectivity.

    So typically you get BT but that’s not enough, you need a bit more since it’s not a well recognized device, unlike e.g. headphones. Typically you would need a companion app, for GrapheneOS, Android more broadly, iOS or a Linux phone. This is where GadgetBridge comes in. The goal of the project is to… bridge gadgets that are not standalone. Instead of having a myriad of (usually proprietary) apps that basically all do the same thing (pair, configure, handle notifications both ways) have 1 that does it for all such device.

    From that standpoint, namely GadgetBridge support, at the moment the recommendation is Pebble (which is how the project started) or PineTime.

    PS: I personally have a Pebble (with hardware issue, so not sure were), a PineTime (also hardware issue, touch on screen AFAIR) and finally a Watchy and… honestly I don’t wear any anymore. I don’t get enough benefit from it as typically I have a phone nearby and when I don’t it means I do NOT want notifications.

  • jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’ve ordered one of the new Pebbles, but in the meantime, I have a PineTime: https://pine64.org/devices/pinetime

    I’ve even given some to nephews and nieces because they are durable enough and so affordable that we don’t need to worry too much about them

    • GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I was so annoyed that Google bought both Pebble and Fitbit, then did… absolutely nothing with them. Would’ve loved a low-end (sub $100) fitness tracker with ePaper.

      Best thing they did was to release the pebble rights back to the creators.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Large corporations don’t buy small companies to make better products. They buy them to eliminate the competition.

      • anguo@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Since they open sourced pebble, I’m hoping a Chinese firm will make a clone soon.

      • Kevin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        There’s a lot to like about the pine time, and it’s really cool that you can adjust things and recompile. The reason it ultimately didn’t work for me was because the vibration motor isn’t strong enough for me to notice if I’m actively doing something. Your mileage may vary, but it’s worth keeping in mind.

        The original pebble and garmin watches have all been great in that respect.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        They have a page about that: https://watchy.sqfmi.com/docs/battery-life

        With only time keeping, Watchy should have a battery life of 5-7 days, while with fetching data over WiFi, it should last between 2-3 days. These numbers can be extended through further optimizations (e.g. sleep during off hours, waking up only on motion/tilt, etc.).

        By default it wakes up the CPU and updates the display every 60 seconds, but you could totally change this to make it only update on demand (the most efficient would be by button press) which should extend the battery life waaay beyond 7 days.

    • ctry21@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I love mine. It’s pretty unobtrusive but there’s a ton of open-source applications available on the store. Probably the most similar to the original Pebble (besides the new pebbles of course) right down to the MIP display. Tried a pinetime but it’s very limited by comparison and an IPS screen on a smartwatch is a terrible idea.

  • Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I kinda had the same though 4 years ago.

    I ended up settling for a nixon Regulus. Its not really smart

    But it has basic functions and NO SPYWARE Which is a big plus

  • jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This probably depends on what you mean by “smart”

    In the old days, dumb phones were defined as devices that shipped with a set of features with users generally being unable to add new features themselves

    And smart phones could be extended by users because they allow installation of apps, etc

    But I don’t think this applies to smart watches: it seems like the difference here is that a smart watch goes beyond “dumb” by having phone/internet connectivity to display more than just times and dates