• brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Could be reporting requirements or KYC stuff. It might differentiate how much information to gather on the passenger or put restrictions on where they can sit, like exit rows.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If it’s an airline, it’s likely to allow them to more accurately predict passenger weight. Planes have weight ratings, and need to be sure their loads are distributed appropriately, (like not having everyone in the very back of the plane). Differentiating the tickets will help them flag potential weight problems before boarding even begins.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They just block two different options in the software so that they could differentiate.

    • cabillaud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Large families still having the possibilty to flight from to time even if they are not so rich?

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah Google flights only shows the base ticket price and doesn’t factor in taxes and fees which easily add an extra 15% or so on most flights. For example, I booked a trip just yesterday where the base price of the tickets was about $900 (and that’s the price that Google Flights showed) but the required taxes and fees pushed it up to $1100

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    158
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let me guess: this is intentionally done to show up at the top of flights price low -> lists.

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah. Anyone using eBay long enough knows to prioritize listings with free shipping over others.

          The same is true with all any other services, the more they break it out the more likely you’ll be scammed.

          It’s not for the consumer’s benefit. They are structuring the transaction to give themselves levers to pull.

          • jumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            it’s funny when they choose $100 shipping on an object that actually does cost $50 to ship, but are $80 cheaper than any other option and have the audacity to complain when I want it shipped to me in Alaska.

  • Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is just silly. I recently saw Las Vegas hotels doing something similar though to a much lesser extent where it’s called “resort fees”. Should be illegal but it doesn’t affect me since I’m not traveling to the US

        • teegus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m guessing it’s the “peak dates” thing. They have a base price aka. minimum price when planes are mostly empty and then put on a surcharge for when demand is high, instead of altering the base price.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        volatile, unpredictable or fluctuating operating costs and fees

        Socialize the Costs and Privatize the Profits

        edit: What confuses me is how these things can be “volatile” and “fluctuating” before they bought the ticket?

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          Like the plaque on your teeth?

          Or did you mean plague, you (to borrow a page from your own playbook), fucking idiot?

          Neither of which is an actual turn of phrase, btw. The phrase you wanted is (ironically, because of the plaque) “it’s like pulling teeth with you.” If you’re going to be a smug dick at least be correct so you don’t embarrass yourself any more than you already do by simply being a smug dick.

        • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Fuck, Dean, lately all you seem to do on lemmy is gripe and insultingly correct people while getting it wrong yourself. Hope you feel better soon.

        • MrShankles@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re a troll-y little thing, ain’t ya. It’s also super cool to be kind for no reason, you should try it!

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    I recently did a return trip from Dublin to Boston and back. Each ticket was 1 Euro; rhe rest was airport taxes, government levies, etc.

    In the past, pre-covid, 1 Euro tickets were not unusual. Part of the reason why Ryanair became so dominant was that they contracted with secondary airports that had much lower fees, so the final price was below what the competitors could offer.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes, Ryanair. But even they could itemize what you had to pay extra for. OP got this instead:

      0

      What confuses me is how these things can be “volatile” and “fluctuating” before they bought the ticket?

      edit: somebody made the Ryanair experience into an operetta song! https://youtu.be/ZAg0lUYHHFc

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mildly infuriating

    • misplacement of $ when screenshot shows correct placement
    • fax of a fax

    Infuriating

    • image of pure text lacking accessibility
    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wow, you’re a pleasant person. Just a big bowl of rainbows and sunshine.

      You didn’t have to write this comment but you did and you look stupid. All you had to do was nothing. Even a monkey can do that.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s such a strange thing to get hostile about. Ironically, it low-key bugs me that we put the dollar sign before the number it’s indicating. “$64” is read as “sixty-four dollars,” not “dollars sixty-four.” So why write it like that? (Not rhetorical, I really want to know. I tried looking up this question to find out the answer, but haven’t found anything conclusive.) Putting the currency symbol behind the number makes more sense, like how some countries write the Euro. (Which also explains why some people might not intuitively place the dollar sign before the number - it’s their native convention and it follows clear logic.)

        So maybe the point was ignorance or fear of the foreign? Or a misguided attempt at English language purity? Or they’re a former Redditor who hasn’t quite shaken off the Reddit “pointless, hostile hot-take” mentality?

        • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          They really just are, too. I went to their page to block them, and like half their comments are just highly-downvoted, sometimes confidently-incorrect bitching.