• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    They’re charging vat on their fee, but leaving it to drivers to charge vat on their part, with most drivers being exempt.

    The only way to prevent that is to class drivers as employees, which is probably a good idea but more complicated than tweaking vat rules.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      You think HMRC is conspiring with Uber with the goal of making less money for HMRC? And that after years of this, it’s never been leaked or alleged?

      Dunno mate. Seems more likely to me that tax-dodging internationals are just experts in dodging tax.

      • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I do. It’s the one conspiracy theory I subscribe to. 😅

        It’s not uncommon for HMRC to make sweetheart deals with large multinationals. There was a massive select committee inquiry in the 2010s into this and I don’t believe anything has changed.

        Counterpoint: HMRC will move quickly and swiftly to stop this loophole and fine Uber and similar companies without hesitation. Oh wait… No they won’t.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s not uncommon for HMRC to make sweetheart deals with large multinationals.

          Yeah, but only if the deal means getting more money for HMRC.

          If a company says “actually we’re going to declare our business operations in tax-free British Sark” then HMRC has to petition the government to stop them from doing that or risk getting no income at all

          Or it can cut them a deal now. It’s a deal with the devil, but these are the realities of getting any income at all